Global Security: US, China Role

English , Kashmir - آزاد جموں کشمیر , / Monday, October 28th, 2024

Download this post as PDF

By: Hameed Shaheen Alvi
The United States and China play significant roles in gradually upped global security management, with their interactions shaping the international econo-security landscape. China has a unique conceptual security vibrancy; that has become a vital aspect of international futuristic approach.

China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) is a concept that promotes a new type of international relations rejecting hegemonism politics and zero-sum games. The GSI rests on six commitments: – Maintaining Common Security: Emphasizing the importance of collective security, – Respecting Sovereignty: Recognizing the territorial integrity of all nations, – Upholding UN Principles: Adhering to the United Nations Charter: Peaceful Dispute Resolution: Encouraging diplomatic solutions to conflicts, – Traditional and Non-Traditional Security: Addressing both conventional and emerging security threats, – Indivisible Security: Highlighting the interconnectedness of national security.

United States takes the GSI from her own point of view. US parallelism includes: – , Strengthening Global Partnerships: Expanding diplomatic relationships to address security crises, – Promoting Peaceful Solutions: Encouraging diplomatic resolutions to conflicts, – Ratifying Key Treaties: Endorsing agreements like the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to establish a clear legal framework.

Ultimately, the complex dynamics between the U.S. and China will significantly impact global security. As the international community navigates these challenges, it’s crucial to prioritize cooperation, understanding, and collective security. Rationality demands that global security trajectory should not be based on ‘rivalism’, rather it should concentrate on its core objective of globalist security; law of nature too demands that there must be security to ensure global peace and normalcy.
Another aspect in relation to global security is that the manufacturers, sellers of ever innovative armaments across the globe do not favor the concept of a compact global security; they see that if that happens then their arms manufacturing empires collapse; reality is that it does not matter to them how many bulks of human lives shall perish in loose international security; already because of gaps in the international security regionalized bloodbaths are taking place; wars are boons to the widening monetary grab of the armaments producers.

In the context of legitimacy of the global security one notices clearly that the US pursues ignition of wars to establish its global writ of influence while China pragmatically applies panacea of economic advantages to secure global presence. This parallel paradigms are lucidly visible to any observer of the global character of both ascending powers: one’s militarization, other’s economic affluence.
Ideal approach can be that both the US and China share their expertise in inducting global security; that will inject confidence of international community of nations in a wished-for future. At least on global level ‘rivalism’ should end for the best prospects of humanity