Trump Outlines One-Sided Ukraine Peace Plan in Ambiguous Terms

rki.news
Former U.S. President Donald Trump has once again stirred international debate with his latest remarks on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, offering a vague and seemingly biased peace proposal that critics say favors Moscow’s interests.
In a recent interview, Trump claimed he could end the war in Ukraine “within 24 hours” if re-elected, yet failed to provide any concrete details on how such a resolution would be achieved. His rhetoric appeared notably soft on Russia, raising concerns among analysts and policymakers about the implications of his approach.
Trump avoided directly criticizing Russian President Vladimir Putin or addressing the Kremlin’s responsibility for initiating the war. Instead, he vaguely alluded to both sides needing to “come together” while refusing to commit to continued U.S. support for Ukraine’s defense. His use of non-committal language such as “it’s a war that never should have started” and “they’re dying over there” was seen by many as an oversimplification of a complex geopolitical crisis.
Critics argue that Trump’s statements risk legitimizing Russia’s aggression and undermine ongoing international efforts to support Ukraine’s sovereignty. Former diplomats and defense experts warn that any peace deal perceived as one-sided could further destabilize Eastern Europe and embolden authoritarian regimes.
Ukrainian officials have not officially responded to Trump’s latest remarks but have previously emphasized that any peace talks must be based on full territorial integrity and the withdrawal of Russian forces.
With the 2024 U.S. presidential race gaining momentum, Trump’s comments signal a sharp contrast with current bipartisan support for Ukraine in Washington—highlighting the potential for a major shift in U.S. foreign policy if he returns to the White House.